I was asking a friend of mine who leans more on the pro-Flock side of things and he said that Flock cameras are generally constitutional so long as they’re only covering public property.
Covering a pool on private property seems to be illegal, unless something in the lease would have granted consent for that level of surveillance.
In the US, this is mostly going to be determined by local or state laws. You generally don’t have an “expectation of privacy” in an area like this even if it’s private property.
Some places may have laws against surveilling someone else’s property though.
Billeting is constitutional in the USA, that does not mean everybody would be just happy to be order to host and feed a bunch of soldiers on testosterone supplements
Just to point out that something being “Constitutional” should not, at all, imply that is good or even desirable for society
I was asking a friend of mine who leans more on the pro-Flock side of things and he said that Flock cameras are generally constitutional so long as they’re only covering public property.
Covering a pool on private property seems to be illegal, unless something in the lease would have granted consent for that level of surveillance.
In the US, this is mostly going to be determined by local or state laws. You generally don’t have an “expectation of privacy” in an area like this even if it’s private property.
Some places may have laws against surveilling someone else’s property though.
Billeting is constitutional in the USA, that does not mean everybody would be just happy to be order to host and feed a bunch of soldiers on testosterone supplements
Just to point out that something being “Constitutional” should not, at all, imply that is good or even desirable for society
Correct.
But an entity like an HOA is much more likely to care about something being illegal than me thinking that it is bad for society.
Fair point