I wonder what sort of good faith arguments one could make in favor of Flock. It’d be one thing if it was effective and worked properly, but it seems like it doesn’t.

One could argue that these cases are rare, but frankly, image recognition technology has improved so much over the past several years that it’s actually hard to understand why Flock tech makes as many mistakes as it does.

I’ve never understood how watermarking text works.

That’s kinda how firings work lowkey

Who the heck had the bright idea to post this to Hacker News?

It should be illegal in all cases unless it’s necessary to prevent or get rid of a life-threatening medical condition for the mother.

Human beings who haven’t done anything don’t deserve to be killed.

Thanks! I don’t get that often on here TBH.

Edit: The civility, not the disagreements, lol

When it comes to political policy stances, I’m pro life, support limited/small government, am fiscally conservative, support capitalism, oppose crime, and am a pretty big fan of constitutional rights like the first and second amendment.

Dude I’m trying lol but it’s so hard

What?

I lean right, but this is ridiculous, I’m sorry. First of all, this isn’t ICE’s job. The FBI should be digging into this, not ICE, perhaps with the help of the CIA if they suspect international involvement with voter fraud.

Second of all, why the heck are we paying Reuters to find the fraud instead of finding it ourselves? That sounds fraudulent in and of itself!

I don’t get why they felt like they needed to lie. Their technology is impressive and it works.