• PenguinInLaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s not how it works - the original author of the input owns the copyright for the work and if the output of the LLM is the same or a close derivative, the that copyright will be infringed. The ruling only means that YOU can not claim copyright for something that LLM spit out and you put your name on.