The census by definition is for people WHO LIVE in a country where it’s conducted, but apparently that’s not the case in Australia where they even make it mandatory for non-citizens (tourists) when they are only visitors (who DO NOT live in Australia in the first place), the logic doesn’t make any sense. Like if, a tourist should not be forced to do it since they hold a foreign passport and have no residential address in Australia.


So an entire federal government department spends millions and millions of dollars to collect all this information for it to not be used?
You are incorrect. ABS data informs education departments routinely. Again, please do at least a minimal amount of searching before you plop onto the Internet and just confidently say random shit with authority.
https://www.abs.gov.au/methodologies/schools-methodology/2024
https://www2.education.vic.gov.au/pal/srp-core-student-learning-allocation/guidance/rural-school-size-adjustment-factor
Self-own here guy. Honestly, if this is the best example of use of ABS data you can find, then the census is indeed a huge waste of money.
You’re referencing an obscure line item in school funding:
Not surprisingly, the amount of funding is calculated by enrolments, as I’ve been saying:
The only use of ABS data is to determine whether a population centre is greater than 20,000 people:
This really is the antithesis of “census driven funding” that you’re trying to illustrate. They’re not counting 3 year olds, or newly weds, or nubile virgins.
The classification of population centre sizes could easily be determined without the census.