• chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are so many naive people in this thread. You think if those people didn’t join they wouldn’t just institute the draft again out of nessesity? Y’all sitting on your high horses looking down on regular ass people who join in an effort to improve their lives. The same people doing so your ass can sit there on lemmy and judge them. Be mad at how the Epstein class uses them not at the rank and file members themselves.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Be a draft dodger then and offer to help your neighbor leave, and if you can’t then go to jail over the military. These people aren’t cardboard boxes who have to do what they’re told, they have agency to quit. Improving your life isn’t an excuse to be complicit, unless you will literally be killed or starve otherwise, neither of which is the case here.

  • Starya67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Guys, most people in the US military are there because they didn’t really have a choice. It might have been their only chance at an education or they were dirt poor and this was the only career available that didn’t involve dealing drugs.

    It’s why the government likes to keep people destitute and keep higher education expensive. Fodder for the military.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        they joined the military. they knew enough about what they were getting into.

        if they joined because it was that or starve, well, they’re not starving, so there’s no problem

  • ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    man, spoiled AF fascist enablers, I would have stabbed a fellow student to death for food this good, where are the ice crystals?

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    They volunteered for this. If they don’t want it, they could demand a discharge or strike until the food is better.

    No sympathy for killers.

    • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      99% of people on a ship are some type of mechanic or tech… they will never hold a gun or kill anyone…

      if you think the guy who keeps the drinking water clean is the same thing as gun carrying foot solider, you’re a certifiable crazy person.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If a person willingly signs up to support killers, does that suddenly make them a better person? And don’t say that they didn’t sign up to support killers. War is A Racket was published in 1935. In our lifetimes, people have known since at least 2003 what the government uses the military for. No Blood For Oil - remember that?

        I don’t have sympathy for anyone who volunteered. Conscripts, certainly. Not volunteers.

      • JoshCodes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean the Nazi soldiers that did train logistics didn’t murder the Jews, right guys? They were good people right? No? Huh funny that.

          • JoshCodes@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Having watched documentaries about it and studied it in uni, I’ve got an idea or two, yeah. Guess what happened to the guy who claimed he “just organised” the holocaust, planning and spreadsheets and such, but didn’t kill anyone himself. Go on, guess.

            People I’ve met who worked in the army describe it as a company who kills people. They know what they’re in and they do it anyway. Conscription is different, even Ukraine is different because its self defence. US soldiers are volunteering to kill people overseas. I’ve got some sympathy for kids who get convinced its the only career for them, but there’s no conflicts going on in or around the US and they didn’t sign up for peacekeeping so…

            • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Having watched documentaries about it and studied it in uni, I’ve got an idea or two, yeah. Guess what happened to the guy who claimed he “just organised” the holocaust, planning and spreadsheets and such, but didn’t kill anyone himself. Go on, guess.

              He moved to the United States?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t believe that. There are only a few ships with great than 1k crews and anyone who mans a weapon system or steers the ship is striking with a weapon waaaayyy more powerful than a mere gun. Heck even the other folks are equivalent to a sniper spoter. Keeping the weapon in good repair. Now I disagree its their fault for signing up (given the us system allows for few oportunities to adequate pay and benefits) but I do agree they should recognize when they should refuse to be part of what is clearly wrong. They should recognize that they are signing something that says they will kill who they are told to kill. Be it with a gun or by maintaining a powerful weapon system.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I don’t give a shit what you believe. I am telling you from first hand experience (not “belief”) the truth.

          You want to do a whole “guilt by association” thing, but you haven’t put ANY thought into what that means. Is the cook a “killer”? Is the IT guy a murder? How about the guy who does fuel maintenance? Yeoman?

          What about those serving on ship tenders? They don’t even have weapons, they’re supply ships. Are they all killers by association too?

          Why not blame farmers too? I mean, they did give the ship tender food… and that tender did give that food to a destroyer… and that destroyer has a cook, so we know he’s a bloodthirsty baby killer… and that food was eaten by hundreds of people… one of them might clean/maintain a weapon system… and someone else might shoot it… so they’re all murders now too… right? Especially that water guy from before…

          Where’s the line? Or maybe, we should just judge the person who pulls the trigger, instead of engaging in blind group punishment?

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            well your truth would have ships running weapons systems with under 10 people and in some cases less than one. In a tank crew the one firing the gun is not the only one killing people.

            • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              Apples and oranges, an amazingly flawed and poorly thought out example.

              You’re comparing 100s (sometimes thousands) to a crew of 3-5 people… as if that’s even nearly the same thing.

              Plus you’re ignoring the whole motopool behind the tankcrew too, and the supply team with them. The mechanics and logisticians, cooks and even water boys…

              And even those two things aren’t comparable. Wheras a “waterboy” in a motopool might have to worry about being directly attacked (and be prepared to defend themselves). Ship maintainers will never have that happen… there’s no scenario where suddenly the ship’s water engineer is picking up a gun to murder people; even in defense…

                • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  brain dead edgy teen take. It’s like saying the amazon delivery drivers are equally uber-capitalist oligarchs.

              • tankfox@bookwyr.me
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Bless you for giving us someone to argue with! The killers cannot kill without helpers to help them kill. If the helpers all decided that the killers needed to stop killing there would be no killing at all, so the killing happens with the consent and participation of the helpers. Drawing a little line around these and those in the organization is especially meaningless seeing as how in real war all are completely valid targets for the killers on both sides.

              • HubertManne@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                When I say don’t believe I mean it does not make logical sense. You are also doubling down without actually taking into what I am saying and pointing out. The main issue is with your 99%. No ship carries thousands. The largest carry over a thousand but just a bit. Most carry hundreds and some carry less than 100. The largest ships with many weapon systems are simply going to need more than 10 people to fire them given they run 24 hours with multiple ships. Similarly the smallest ship cannot have only one sailor who fires weapons. Ship maintainers often are these people. If the ship is not using its weapons they don’t sit around. They do maintenance. Further if you job is to help keep the ship running you are part of the ships killing. If you work in a factory on land making shells for the ship you are. And we as taxpayers are as well. There are degrees but when you sign on to help do the killing that degree is very very close even if you don’t pull triggers.

          • tankfox@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            When the mob is committing crime, RICO treats the whole organization as equally responsible. To dismantle organized crime you MUST also go after the helpers, the ones who assist the murderers and then exclaim that their hands are clean. Nope, you all share the same blood on all of your hands.

            • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I thought the purpose of Rico was to dismantle the mob by getting the ones at the top instead of the lowly peasants of the organization. The uphill guilty by association. I don’t remember Rico being used to finally pin the kid making delivery runs.

              • SPRUNTnsfw@fedinsfw.app
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                RICO goes after everybody in the hopes that the ones at the bottom will continue turning on their leaders until it gets to the top. If the ones at the bottom don’t flip, they are charged with the rest. The kid making the delivery runs will absolutely get charged if he retains solidarity with the organization.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are the parents responsible for their kid? Absolutely.

          Is the paper pusher in operations responsible for the fighter pilot? no… they’re not.

          • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Who do you think is the one making sure the kill orders are delivered to the right squad, or that the squad has the proper requisition orders for the equipment needed to carry out that kill mission?

            The killing doesn’t happen without the whole logistics chain working.