fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days ago🦈🦈🦈mander.xyzimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up1507arrow-down110
arrow-up1497arrow-down1image🦈🦈🦈mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·3 days agoFunny, I just wish the image wasn’t so horribly compressed. I can’t even see the 4 gills on Facebook’s one. Also, why does Apple get 9/10 and Samsung only 8/10 when they’re pretty much identical in terms of accuracy?
minus-squareLemmisaur@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·3 days ago Here’s the Facebook Shark in full quality.
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoTIL that sharks have, and always have had five gill slits??? Is this a Mandela effect situation?
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 days agoAnd they are way more compressed than on those images. I now realized I never had a good idea of how sharks look like.
Funny, I just wish the image wasn’t so horribly compressed. I can’t even see the 4 gills on Facebook’s one.
Also, why does Apple get 9/10 and Samsung only 8/10 when they’re pretty much identical in terms of accuracy?
Here’s the Facebook Shark in full quality.
TIL that sharks have, and always have had five gill slits??? Is this a Mandela effect situation?
And they are way more compressed than on those images.
I now realized I never had a good idea of how sharks look like.