Apple:
Google:
Microsoft:
Samsung:
Whatsapp:
Twitter:
Facebook:
LG:
Wow Twitter’s really does suck, huh?
I don’t mind the Microsoft style, but I wouldn’t be sure it’s a shark without context
here is the full res version of the image, via the author’s 2019 twitter thread… where there was also this important update two years later:
this other post “A Marine Biologist Ranks Shark Emojis” covers some of the same and also some other ones
Shouldn’t get a perfect score when it’s still missing a fin, wtf!?
I’m saying this lightly, but “triggering af”
No, I think you used that term 100% appropriately. Trigger warning to anyone who hasn’t viewed the image, yet.
Graded on a curve
See similar review of ant emoji.
“Firefox: that is a termite.”
Embedded the image, you have to click to view full size probably:
Hork bajir reference gets an upvote
And that ant’s mouth parts/muzzle really does look like a Hork-Bajir’s mouth does on the covers that feature them!
Funny, I just wish the image wasn’t so horribly compressed. I can’t even see the 4 gills on Facebook’s one.
Also, why does Apple get 9/10 and Samsung only 8/10 when they’re pretty much identical in terms of accuracy?
Here’s the Facebook Shark in full quality.
TIL that sharks have, and always have had five gill slits??? Is this a Mandela effect situation?
And they are way more compressed than on those images.
I now realized I never had a good idea of how sharks look like.
Google gets bonus points for being the most blahaj.
Unfortunately, they changed it:
How long until Muskrat replaces the Twitter emojis with AI slop?
The Apple and Samsung ones look oddly similar
Default androidHere are some fishies more
Til all sharks do a shrimp pose. Must be the Victory sign equivalent for humans
It’s because they’re all caught in an invisible square cage :(
How do any of these sharks function without a cloaca?!?
Fish asshole y is usually hidden in an anal fin.
The most important metric is shark happiness.
