• saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m thinking not. Having had my fair share of tear gas, it’s not fun. Even a block away it’ll warm up your face because it’s just in the air. The masks are literally just got breathing and seeing, but it’s still very uncomfortable up close.

      • calliope@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        As mentioned in comments below, it’s a Chicago Tribune photographer, Stacey Wescott. Amazing photographer!

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Incredible shot then. I go to the World Press Exhibition each year and this is the kind of image you see taking the awards. There’s a ot of perfect timings all happening at once for it to work out.

          • calliope@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I was 100% thinking that too! I saw it and immediately was like “wow, that looks like it will win a prize.”

            Cool to hear you go to the press exhibition each year! You must see a lot of amazing photos there.

            I’m an amateur photographer and mostly do insects.

            Incredible timing, positioning, and framing. Also preparation I assume, being able to take the photo in that environment. Even the wind had to be right! Remarkable.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          And my apologies, but an error is disallowing me to edit the other reply.

          “Shit” = “Shot”

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have doubts it’s a “shot” based on the vibrant comp of the individual and their reaction to what’s in their proximity. But most noteably, the image isn’t 8:10 as the majority of cameras shoot. But it could be all real and, shit on a blad or something, and in that case it’s a stunning example of photojournalism.

          Unfortunately, these are the times we live in now. Editting, photomanip, and now AI are all just too easy