
Thank you… very much, @puckpuckpuckow@lemmy.world …
Not only some are tired of this LLM/“AI”… but the “two kinds/types”? My dear… is it just “two persons” on this planet, world, universe… they consider?
…cogito, ergo sum…

Thank you… very much, @puckpuckpuckow@lemmy.world …
Not only some are tired of this LLM/“AI”… but the “two kinds/types”? My dear… is it just “two persons” on this planet, world, universe… they consider?

What a nonsense, sorry…
Human is human already, regardless how they speak and what they do…
There’s always true sympathy and empathy to find in a human, regardless how busy, dark, erroneous etc. they are…
Yet, it’s the true alive soul inside in every person…
Medics are likely tired, doing their job every single day, yet they have empathy, and will always try to listen if you actually try…
They know what PAIN, AGONY, DEATH, SORROW… fear means…
LLM/“AI” will always pretend to be a human, since it’s “trained”/designed, to be so, and will always be limited and incomplete…
Not to mention the initial dataset of numerous emphatic actual human has its limited memory inside, no one is responsible for.
What a hopeless sorrow is that awful trendy, advertised, mind-atrophying mess…
Ineffably magnificent…
No, thank you. Sorry, never.
Not only that, but the huge probability of mistakes is just deafening. The last time I used LLM was in 2023 someone recommended for a task at paper work, and I got a literal headache in 10 minutes… Since then I never ever will use that sorrow for anything that is not for blackbox pentesting or experimental unverified data generated you may find in medicine or military isolated solutions.
That deafening feel that every single bit of output from that LLM or void machine may contain a mistake no soul is accountable for to ask about… A generated bit of someone’s work you just cannot verify since no source nor human is available… How would you trace the rationale that resulted in the output shown?
Faster? Is that so… Doesn’t verification of every output require even more time to test it and consider stable, to prove it is correct, to stay accountable for the knowledge and actions you perform as a developer, artist, researcher… human?
Your mind is to be trained to do a research, remember, and do not depend on someone’s service to a level of predominance/replacement.
Meanwhile, effort, passion, creativity, empathy, and love, in turn, you carry, supports in long-term.
You may not care now, though, but you do you. It’s your mind and memory you develop.
Thank you! You do you.
deleted by creator
In other words, that article is about “self-hosted mind atrophy with skills degradation running in parallel.”
No. Absolutely no. You should code with your mind, and stay creative.
Related: Using AI Generated Code Will Make You a Bad Programmer
I do not consider this fair, or adequate, regardless, of course. If you are healthy, you must be proud of it. It’s pure disgrace, regardless.
Yes, these people may exploit the system, and probably are proud of it, but this all subconsciously affects self-confidence deeply, morally/psychologically, and it sure comes out soon or late from the mind and heart, from soul, especially if they started at age of tuitions, I believe.
And here, for around 40 years living, working in military and education, I haven’t met anyone yet who would actually recover their inner stance enough to not become a fearful and self-disclosed individual, since the ethics border gets shift and blur gradually and permanently. These never find peace throughout their life, and trust no one, including themselves, which is indescribably sorrowful…