zippy@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 hours agoGIMP rebranding as WLBR?gitlab.gnome.orgexternal-linkmessage-square110linkfedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down14
arrow-up1106arrow-down1external-linkGIMP rebranding as WLBR?gitlab.gnome.orgzippy@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 10 hours agomessage-square110linkfedilink
minus-squareMeetMeAtTheMovies [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 hours ago Do we have any actual documentation of anybody who might be called a ‘gimp’ actually being offended by the name? You want documentation that gimp is offensive? Go call your boss a gimp. They’ll give you some documentation. Feel free to share it here. Gimp does not refer to people with movement disabilities. It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program. Pretending to not understand when an acronym spells a word is a new one to me. Maybe you should be writing bill names for congress. Or is this just more performant bullshit? I dunno about you, but last time I used it, gimp was pretty performant. See? That’s me intentionally misunderstanding something obvious in order to ignore a point you’re making. See how transparent and ineffective it is?
You want documentation that gimp is offensive? Go call your boss a gimp. They’ll give you some documentation. Feel free to share it here.
Pretending to not understand when an acronym spells a word is a new one to me. Maybe you should be writing bill names for congress.
I dunno about you, but last time I used it, gimp was pretty performant.
See? That’s me intentionally misunderstanding something obvious in order to ignore a point you’re making. See how transparent and ineffective it is?