• Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Interviewing is (ideally) quite a structured type of conversation, when is a job interview. A lot of people have to lock in pretty hard to deal with how unnatural it is, and they might not have the spare bandwidth to catch a joke.

    Especially not someone from HR, they’re fucking troglodytes.

      • MSBBritain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Oh I’ve seen some pretty bad interviewing, where HR is sent in with a question sheet and a box to tick for which key words the interviewee mentioned per question.

        Obviously a red flag and useless method of interviewing, but it does happen frighteningly often. Especially where the IT team is so understaffed, they can’t spare the time to do interviews.

        • SwampYankee@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This is done, especially in government work, to limit bias in the interview process. Ideally, though, the people conducting the interviews understand the questions they’re asking and can use some judgement and give credit if someone explained a concept but didn’t hit the specific keyword.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Well sure, but the context for my comment was the unnatural-ness of a structured job interview. If you’re not just pantsing it, such interviews follow a script, and that’s not how we normally talk to each other.