• TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    6 hours ago

    on a job interview in IT, an interviewer asked me if I understood the difference between TCP and UDP. After giving the best technical explanation I could, I ended with

    I could tell you a UDP joke, but I’m not sure if you’d get it.

    He said go ahead

    I paused, that was it.

    Kind of awkward.

    I didn’t get the job.

      • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Tcp and udp are to sum it up, internet messaging protocols. UDP specifically is when you send a message over without guaranteeing your message was received. TCP on the otherhand is more like a handshake where you send a message and expect a response back.

        The joke is basically UDP=I dont know if you would get it

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        There’s pretty basic UDP, that sends without confirming receiving. And instead of fixing it, they just slapped another protocol, TCP, on top of it.

        With only UDP, you don’t know, if you get it.

        • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Interviewing is (ideally) quite a structured type of conversation, when is a job interview. A lot of people have to lock in pretty hard to deal with how unnatural it is, and they might not have the spare bandwidth to catch a joke.

          Especially not someone from HR, they’re fucking troglodytes.

            • MSBBritain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Oh I’ve seen some pretty bad interviewing, where HR is sent in with a question sheet and a box to tick for which key words the interviewee mentioned per question.

              Obviously a red flag and useless method of interviewing, but it does happen frighteningly often. Especially where the IT team is so understaffed, they can’t spare the time to do interviews.

            • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              42 minutes ago

              Well sure, but the context for my comment was the unnatural-ness of a structured job interview. If you’re not just pantsing it, such interviews follow a script, and that’s not how we normally talk to each other.

    • captcha@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the experiments were no fun for the dogs

      I would really expect most experiments to be no fun for animals that are experimented on

      • Arigion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Since Pavlow is so famous you see often the dogs depicted as cute and someone ringing a bell. Not as fixated pepsin machines. At least in the past that was my mental image. Might be a me problem.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Assuming they all don’t have a very-literal-interpretation-of-jokes-leading-to-no-sense-of-humour, I think people usually laugh appreciatively at someone trying to lighten the mood in settings like this, even when they’ve heard the joke before.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’ve found that everyone at uni is like this. Humourless weirdosfellows, maybe they just exhaust themselves with drink, drugs and dancing every night and can’t process my jokes.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No one laughed, I’m too witty for this class.

    Given how the cookie crumbles in plenty unis, odds are most of the class didn’t even know about the experiments, so they didn’t know enough to even notice the wit.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, they are there to learn after all, he didn’t assume his students knew, and asked if they did. One guy in the class knew. Seems like it’s working itself out, and he just needs to keep that one loaded for later in the semester when people are primed to get it.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s fair, you’re right. I guess my comment was a bit too bitter.

        I always expected people starting a uni course to at least know the very basics of the subject. You know, out of interest. For psychology it would be the basics of Freud (something dreams, id/ego/superego), Pavlov and Skinner (experiments with other animals, focus on behaviour instead of “mind”), Piaget (child development) etc.

        But then your comment made me remember psychology classes are rather common for people from other graduations, specially when they’ll become teachers or professors.

  • Saapas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve heard that same joke a million times. It’s what I’d expect to find at the top of a Reddit thread.

    It’s a witty joke but a common one, so wouldn’t chuckle tbh