Mio's site
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days ago

Hope you like math

lemmy.today

message-square
64
link
fedilink
1.02K

Hope you like math

lemmy.today

MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
64
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.

    I also learned that FUCKING GOD!! is my go-to expletive when I spilled some icecream and my daughter (3 at the time) started yelling it in the car.

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      ‘What in the fucking fuck’ implies that fucking is an injective function over the field of fucks.

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        From this we can infer that there is a complex function homomorphic to fucking 🤔

  • Entitle9294@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I’ll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does “isomorphic with the complex field” mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I’ve done in category theory.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f© and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        “i do not give a single fuck” implies an additive identity fuck, and “I don’t give two fucks” implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That’s a start at least!

      • Entitle9294@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.

        I’ll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞

        • DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          ELI5: it means that for every number there’s a matching fuck and vice versa.

          • Eq0@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not only for any number of fucks there is a corresponding complex number, but the basic operations (+, -, x, /) work in the same way for fucks and complex numbers

            Overall, if two things are isomorphic you can consider them «  the same »

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Good luck!

      • Atlas_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hmmm. But what if fucks aren’t fungible?

  • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.

    • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      0+0i

  • Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    No prove of irrational fucks yet tho

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plenty of empirical evidence around.

      • Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        But do we get all of them?

  • kirkoman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.

    • Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Here, I gotchu:

      The phrase “you stupid fuck” Implies the existence of irrational fucks.

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oh, there’s definitely irrational fucks. I don’t see a proof that there’s indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F, though.

    • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person. Though I suppose all that means is that there are some irrational elements in the set, not necessarily that it’s isomorphic to the field of complex numbers. So can we diagonalize fuckery somehow…?

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    And relative fucks

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s mainly limited to the American South.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant (TAC for short).

    • 🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is the speed of fucks thus constant?

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        deleted by creator

      • mrsemi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        deleted by creator

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    fan-fucking-tastic

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    This does not even scratch the surface of the possible uses and variations of fuck.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are definitely positive and negative fucks

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There being absolute fucks doesn’t imply positive and negative fucks though.

      It implies we’ve set a point to measure against which we call zero fucks.

      Perhaps there’s an absolute zero fucks which can never be reached.

  • icelimit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy fuck?

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which implies the existence of a non god affected fucks.

      • icelimit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Given the overwhelming prevalence of holy fucks relative to damned fucks, does this suggest sanctified beings get laid more?

        • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Idk, there’s so much talk about virgins in heaven, you’d think it’s the opposite!

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Must be a reference to the space of topological fucks. I believe this one is equivalent to the torus.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    What the uncomputable fuck

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ahh the navier stokes fuck. Believed to actually be computable.

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Must be an angel with wings, so they can also have a flying fuck.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve never given a flying fuck though, and I’ve never heard anyone else give one either, so I’m not convinced they exist.

        • MohamedMoney@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They are rare and seldom bestowed

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The holy trinity.

      Fucking God Damn, Jesus Fucking Christ and Holy Fuck.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      No idea, but I do see plenty of evil fucks every day on the news.

  • Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:

    “I don’t give a single solitary fuck”

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      These are are simply unitary fucks. Matrix fucks with eigenvalue absolute value of 1. Surprisingly useful for quantum computing applications.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    ∅ = how many i have left to give.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What the fuck

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or at least they’re trying…

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.87K users / day
  • 5.83K users / week
  • 9.85K users / month
  • 12.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 16.1K subscribers
  • 769 Posts
  • 9.25K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org