• Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      On the side of content creators, this means no published written work is safe, meaning if one doesn’t want to contribute to LLMs or have their art plagiarised in some way, they can’t submit it anywhere that the public will easily find it. The best option now is sites that have the latest AI scrape/robot defense, for everything produced or shared digitally.

      Fuck Meta and all the other corporations including the DOJ. America is the birthplace of evil and the world, while still connected to it, suffers.

      A life on the seas is criminal, yes, but not wrong. Criminal simply means ‘against the interests of the state’. And the state is shit.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m the man who made my intelligence

    My intelligence is man made

    Artificial

    Copyright law no longer applies to me

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Because turning books into a language model is transformative. No LLM is a substitute for the original works.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Non sequitur, no matter who would have won such a case, the winner would have turned out with more money?

      I am generally sympathetic to making copyright weaker and less restrictive, so I consider this a good thing even while not being very interested in or enthusiastic about AI.