Non sequitur, no matter who would have won such a case, the winner would have turned out with more money?
I am generally sympathetic to making copyright weaker and less restrictive, so I consider this a good thing even while not being very interested in or enthusiastic about AI.
Of course, because money is more important than anything else.
Because turning books into a language model is transformative. No LLM is a substitute for the original works.
Non sequitur, no matter who would have won such a case, the winner would have turned out with more money?
I am generally sympathetic to making copyright weaker and less restrictive, so I consider this a good thing even while not being very interested in or enthusiastic about AI.