• IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The article does not say that there have been 600k casualties. It says there are 600k fighting in Ukraine.

    Where did you get “already lost at least 600,000”?

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree that the 600K figure is a mis-read of the article; however:

      According to figures from Ukraine's General Staff, Russia has lost 217,440 troops since Jan. 1, 2025.
      
      The discrepancy tallies with Western analysis of Russia's staggering losses.
      
      "They lose somewhere in the ballpark of 35,000 to 45,000 people per month, and perhaps they recruit a little bit north of that number," George Barros, Russia team lead at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), told the Kyiv Independent earlier this month.
      

      I am generally inclined to believe Ukraine’s official figures of over 1 million dead, injured or captured Russian soldiers so far in this “3 day special military operation”.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You don’t. You have lots of conscription to supplant your front lines. You do all sorts of corruption in the middle-ranks of the military, so junior officers can generate income off the desperation of their greener soldiers. You create an industry around the war, such that everyone hates it but someone is always profiting off the misery of others.

          And then the machine grinds on.