• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I keep reading about how Russia’s economy is on the brink of collapse just like how I keep reading about how Trump’s voters are turning on him. I believe that both are (somewhat) true, but I don’t think anything will come from either one.

  • Mavytan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So there’s a stable inflow and outflow. I wonder what fractions are dead, wounded (disabled permanently), wounded (temporary), and retired (back to civilian life in one form or another, likely traumatized).

    Alternatively, Russia is building up a massive army outside of Ukraine. That seems unlikely though, there’s no news about that, I’ll discard that hypothesis for now.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    War is basically all logistics and the value Ukraine is getting out of their drone program is insane

  • PotatoLibre@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Russia it was already a mess before but considering their median age, after a 1mln loss they’re as good as fucked.

    Putin doesn’t care about his country, but Russians then?

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    For context, the America lost about 55,000 soldiers in the Vietnam War, which lasted about 10-12 years. Russian has already lost at least 600,000 in a couple of years.

    • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The article does not say that there have been 600k casualties. It says there are 600k fighting in Ukraine.

      Where did you get “already lost at least 600,000”?

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree that the 600K figure is a mis-read of the article; however:

        According to figures from Ukraine's General Staff, Russia has lost 217,440 troops since Jan. 1, 2025.
        
        The discrepancy tallies with Western analysis of Russia's staggering losses.
        
        "They lose somewhere in the ballpark of 35,000 to 45,000 people per month, and perhaps they recruit a little bit north of that number," George Barros, Russia team lead at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), told the Kyiv Independent earlier this month.
        

        I am generally inclined to believe Ukraine’s official figures of over 1 million dead, injured or captured Russian soldiers so far in this “3 day special military operation”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You don’t. You have lots of conscription to supplant your front lines. You do all sorts of corruption in the middle-ranks of the military, so junior officers can generate income off the desperation of their greener soldiers. You create an industry around the war, such that everyone hates it but someone is always profiting off the misery of others.

            And then the machine grinds on.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kelin was then asked about Russian army recruitment.

    “I’m not a specialist in this area, but as I understand it we have 50-60,000 a month, those volunteers who are coming, recruiting, posting, and they would like to get engaged in this thing (in Ukraine),” he replied.

    He did not explain why the size of the Russian army fighting in Ukraine has gone down despite what would amount to around 250,000 extra troops being recruited and sent to the front since the beginning of the year.

    From I figure, basically by giving recruitment numbers and total numbers in Ukraine, the West can calculate number of casualties, which the West figures is 1 million. Remember casualties includes injured.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ukraine has been keeping a tally of Russian losses since pretty early on, and it’s been pretty much perfectly accurate.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminds of of that scene in tiberian sun when NOD installs the new AI

    EVA: “Casualties rates unacceptable, this course of action -”

    Anton: “stop, Activate the reprogramming”

    EVA:“Casualty rates well within acceptable parameters”

    I get the feeling they take ww2 loses before they even notice.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It alludes to the staggering number in the title and in the abstract but does not give the number which means it’s clickbait.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The discrepancy tallies with Western analysis of Russia’s staggering losses. “They lose somewhere in the ballpark of 35,000 to 45,000 people per month, and perhaps they recruit a little bit north of that number,” George Barros, Russia team lead at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), told the Kyiv Independent earlier this month.