Uh huh, sure mr tankie, I sound like a moron. Get blocked.

“It doesn’t impact us”. The most shortsighted, idiotic reason possible.

Nope, by law Russia cannot use conscripts outside their own borders. All of them signed a contract to be there.

You are arguing with me and you are looking to confirm your existing bias. You are asking me for ridiculous proof for what’s essentially someone saying “they are biased, here is one example” and you keep asking for more. As I said, I am not your monkey, don’t want to look for more, don’t want to put in the effort, then stay in your bubble of ignorance.

Jfc you aren’t talking to a search engine. Want to search, ask google. I directly provided info on their bias. The entire thing was controversial like a year ago here on lemmy. I’m not a monkey to be jumping through hoops to prove something to you. Don’t want to believe me even after I provided the example, don’t, I don’t care.

From their own description of Al Jazeera

Al Jazeera has been a valuable voice for the Palestinians as most Western media favors Israel. While most of its reporting has been factual in covering the conflict they have demonstrated one-sided reporting that tends to denigrate Israel.

Mixed for factual reporting. They cite 2 articles that they have found to be false since forever. They complain about “loaded language”. Yet they say “straight news has minimal bias”. Then they give Times of Israel “high credibility” and speak how unbiased their language is, giving the same examples as they gave in the Al Jazeera one for “biased language”.

High credibility is 2 “levels” higher than the middle of the field “mixed”.

I already gave you the examples, I said that they unfairly represent middle eastern news as untrustworthy. Or are you here to nitpick and “um ackthcshually”?

Their problem is that any news agency in the middle east is automatically “untrustworthy” with quotes like “they haven’t been found to report false stories, but we still give them an untrustworthy rating”.

It is itself extremely biased, you believed an authority that isn’t neutral.

Have you tried not being a tankie and thinking for a second, or actually doing your own research?

Those “fellow civillians” weren’t civilians, they were secret police. So I don’t know what good does the video do.

They weren’t “fellow civillians”.