• MeetMeAtTheMovies [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I hope they really commit to this. Keep gimp as an option for the obstinate among us, but make wlbr the default. Gimp is, even to people who don’t recognize it as a slur, an informal and rude word and it makes it hard for people who already don’t care about open source to not just dismiss it out of hand when they hear that name.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Do we have any actual documentation of anybody who might be called a ‘gimp’ actually being offended by the name? Or is this just more performant bullshit?

      Every time one of these changes is made it creates confusion for thousands or millions of people. And it creates a reload on other software packages and dependencies to change the name.

      It is no different than software changing and interface for the sake of changing it. You are forcing your users to relearn something they already know which has a real cost in time and potentially in dollars.

      Gimp does not refer to people with movement disabilities. It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program. You want to make things less offensive, double down on what the acronym stands for rather than changing it.

      • MeetMeAtTheMovies [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Do we have any actual documentation of anybody who might be called a ‘gimp’ actually being offended by the name?

        You want documentation that gimp is offensive? Go call your boss a gimp. They’ll give you some documentation. Feel free to share it here.

        Gimp does not refer to people with movement disabilities. It stands for GNU Image Manipulation Program.

        Pretending to not understand when an acronym spells a word is a new one to me. Maybe you should be writing bill names for congress.

        Or is this just more performant bullshit?

        I dunno about you, but last time I used it, gimp was pretty performant.

        See? That’s me intentionally misunderstanding something obvious in order to ignore a point you’re making. See how transparent and ineffective it is?