• Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Turned out, writing interesting compelling stories is hard actually. You need way more than an idea, especially if your idea is “what if true things, but the opposite”

  • Ellvix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Hell yes! I totally use ley lines, contrails, and all sorts of crap in my DMing. It works crazy well and has so much documentation my job is easier.

  • chad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Brandon Sanderson is a Mormon and is a professor at BYU. I interpret his works as Mormon fanfiction.

  • lenuup@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Other way around. If your fantasy / sci-fi novel does not sell well, rebrand it as a new groundbreaking “history”. Include how it gets ridiculed by main stream science that does maliciously ignore all the evidence.

    You have instantly gained a huge, uncritical customer and fan base.

    Edited a few typos.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Seriously? I heard it was one of the worst movies of all time so I stayed away. Or was it because of the scientology? Like if I ignore that, is it pretty decent?

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s a terrible movie. Verges on so bad it’s good. Uses more dutch angles than a crooked windmill.

            Book was mediocre with a Mary Sue main that had Goodboy for a last name.

            • abbadon420@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I never saw the movie, but I can accept mediocre for the book. I thought it was a fun take aliens and alternative history. The writing style is a bit like a morally superior american, but I can read past that (…I guess, because I completely forgot that part).

              • Machinist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                It’s been a long time since I read the book, but I remeber it being medicore late golden era. Hubbard had no understanding of radiation and his characters tended to be good or evil without a lot of nuance.

                *Hubbard/Herbert

            • P00ptart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              “verges on so bad it’s good” so to me that says that it’s about as bad as it can possibly get, before crossing the line into something I can laugh at, would that be an accurate representation?

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember a game I played ~9 years ago where you could send ships to explore the world and when they got back you had the option to reject their findings. If you never rejected anything, the world would be exactly like Earth, but everytime you rejected it would randomize the section that had been explored and over time it would start generating a whole new world.

    And you could even make the planet flat by rejecting the discovery of it being round.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh my god that’s so cool I wish I’d thought of it. It’s similar to this idea I’ve been mulling over about a world where areas are fixed/dynamic based on how certain people are about them. But that is a better implementation than anything I sketched up.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Adding to the requests for a name. I put your post into Gemini and it gave me a few choices, but all clearly wrong, before giving up and saying “it must be some obscure indie title”.

      Tried again with the “deeper thinking” version. Reus by chance?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, so “AI” is just text prediction. It won’t give you results that haven’t been talked about a lot (accurate or otherwise). It’s not actually using intelligence and trying to find the answer, so it’s useless for something like this.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, and I was hoping it would find articles or game descriptions that would give it an answer. I wasn’t expecting magic. I was expecting it to pull from its sources and regurgitate an answer. GTFO of here trying to “wElL AcKsHuLly, AI is…”

          Crazy of me to think that in all the games journalism it’s pulled from that it might know. For the record, the answers it did give me were close and it was able to articulate why those answers might not be right because they didn’t meet all of my criteria and it elaborated as to why. The answer I got was actually fairly helpful, unlike whatever you just dumped out.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure, but you adding a comment which you admit was wrong and just AI slop didn’t help anything. If you’re trying to find niche information, AI probably won’t work. It doesn’t matter the resources it has. It isn’t thinking. It just pulls things that have the most relevancy, which will by definition be things that are more common, not accurate. It’ll help you find popular titles, but not niche ones with very little written on them.

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              If I had said I searched it it wouldn’t be any different.

              Get off your high horse and honestly, fuck you. You’re just a troll.

              My comment also asked for the title and actually got that as a response.

              All you’ve done is shit everywhere and show what a collassal jackass you are. Read the room. No one gives a shit. We’re talking about the game and you’re going off on some stupid half baked AI tangent.

              Go touch some grass.

                • fishos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  And I’d do it again you fucking neckbeard. I don’t owe you shit. Don’t start a conversation trying to be a know it all douche and you wouldnt get treated like a know it all douche.

                  Now, you have 2 choices: you can stay here and keep responding and prove you’re a retarded troll…

                  Or you can fuck off. I think I already made it pretty clear that I value your opinion lower than pond scum, so what are you hoping to accomplish?

                  But go ahead, maybe next time I’ll have AI write my insults for me. You can choke on that slop.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Uncensored both in that the actual censorship is removed but also that it hasn’t been compressed to shit so we can read and see the details.

      Thanks!

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    i bet those books would suck tbh. the conspiracies they come up with for the most part aren’t even imaginative

    if someone said “i just thought of a great idea for a fantasy world for a book im gonna write. you know how the earth is round? what if… it wasn’t?” you would just be like “why?” and none of these people have ever been able to answer that

    • lenuup@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What if the world was flat, like a disc. A discworld, so to say. And it is like this because the corner of the cosmos it floats through is just a bit more absurd than regular reality.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Conspiracy theorists don’t have the imagination to write fantasy literature. They can’t account for the inconsistencies in their theories and 99% of the time the reason they give for why a certain thing is the way it is amounts to: “the Jews did it”.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah I remember loving all that conspiracy, X-Files, Umberto, past lives, lost cities, etc etc — all that stuff. But scratch at any of it and it’s always some of the dullest, unimaginative reactionary bullshit just a hair’s width below the surface.

      Not to stereotype, but reminds of prison where everyone complains about capitalism without actually using that word (probably different now), but talk to them for more than 30 minutes annnnnd yup that’s antisemitism again. Fucking hell.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Falling for conspiracy theories is a mental disorder. They’re failing to process information critically. They couldn’t write anything because writing requires skill, persistence, and consistency.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And writing, particularly editing, requires considering multiple possibilities and disregarding the bad ones.

  • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s a great way of saying this. I used to enjoy talking about this stuff and when people would question if I believed any of it I’d have to explain I just like thought experiments and writing syfy shorts.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah! It’s like just considering these things is fun and enriching. You might let yourself get swept away in the fantasy a bit, but ultimately you’re telling yourself different stories.

      So they only ever feel like stories, and not like, a whole to paradigm that you’re going to flash your BIOS with rofl. Just maybe run it in a sandbox/cgroup and see if anything actually fun or inspiring comes out.

      Pardon the opaque metaphors.