Mio's site
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
zedgeist@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
16 hours ago

How to cook a chicken

lemmy.world

message-square
79
link
fedilink
499

How to cook a chicken

lemmy.world

zedgeist@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
16 hours ago
message-square
79
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    So, how many slaps to cook Stephen Miller?

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    As your friendly neighborhood person with knowledge about food and cooking, 2 pounds is an absurd weight for an uncooked rotisserie chicken, that is a very small and cooked weight, 4-6 pounds is going to be typical. Also, more importantly, you cannot cook something faster by increasing the temperature past a pretty quick point, meat is an excellent insulator. No slap can cook the inside of a frozen chicken unless the entire chicken disintegrates.

    Tbf though, a slap at 3700 mph would absolutely disintegrate the chicken.

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Shredded chicken it is

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And your hand

  • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Gotta love how everyone forgot about Newton in all this. Enjoy your instantly well-cooked hand, which is also made of meat.

    • weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Double the food. Sweet!

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Fucking nerds in the commentsl love it

  • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No one’s going to point out the absurd starting assumption KE=mcT??

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Why is that absurd?

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        You need a perfect transfer of the kinetic energy to the chicken for that to hold, not a slap

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is that less or more the energy of your average Falcon Punch?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What if I wanted to cook the chicke through friction, by say inserting an object 3 fingers or so thick in and out of its cavity as fast as athletically possible? … so um… how long should I keep fucking my chicken?

    • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Math says it’ll take more than 2 minutes, so unfortunately it’s out of reach for you

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      alternatively, how long do I have to keep choking my chicken to cook it?

  • fantoozie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Lord have mercy on folks cooking their chicken to 400 F. Those birds will come out as dry as the sands of the Sahara.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      https://youtu.be/hzMzFGgmQOc?t=285

      “well done steaks. if I see a speck of red, it’s going back. you better cook my food”.

      Signed, a well done meat enjoyer.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean, false equivalency, don’t you think? I have yet to meet an enjoyer of medium-rare chicken, probably because the Salmonella or Listeria already took them out

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    But how do you get the chicken back from the stratosphere once you’ve slapped it that fast?

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You start in the stratosphere and slap it down towards the Earth.

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Smh it’s like these people have never slapped a chicken before

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Better to slap it twice at half strength so that it’s cooked when you catch it.

    • random8847@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lmao

  • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    205°C 😂😂😂

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Common sense and physicists are common enemies

      • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I confirm this as a physics PhD. I also understand exactly this thinking of assuming a system is in thermal equilibrium where it is far from it (like a chicken in am oven).

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Maybe they like their chicken fucking black

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well otherwise it has to stay at some 100 degrees for quite a long time to consider it cooked

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You need the chicken to be 165F or 74C to be food safe. It takes a long time to cook at 100-200C because the heat is being transferred much slower. If we’re using this instant slap-based cooking method, it only needs to get to the food safe temperature.

        Using the OP’s calculations and a cooked temperature of 74C:

        It would take 8315 average slaps

        or

        A slap at around 813m/s or 1819mph.

        *Edit for a correction to the second calculation (it still might be wrong), also, I rounded the numbers to whole integers.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I rounded the numbers to whole integers

          whole integers, the best kind of integers

          • medgremlin@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            31 minutes ago

            Look, I just finished my medical board exams recently. My brain is running on the power of about 2/3rds of a yukon gold potato here.

  • sm1dger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Typical physicist, ignoring enthalpy of phase changes. Starting from 1C defrosted makes a huge difference from 0C as the melting takes up a ton more energy/slaps. Their underslapped chicken would give you salmonella

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They haven’t considered rate of slap. Significant heat transfer to environment even at 10 slaps per second.

      They’re also assuming sea level standard atmospheric conditions. You may need to reduce rate of slap at altitude.

      • marius@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Also only about half the heat goes into the chicken and the other half into the hand used for slapping

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I believe we’re well on our way to developing the worlds first slap coefficient.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Also completely neglecting that not all the energy in a slap will be transferred to thermal energy in the chicken.

      • Balthazar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Assume a spherical chicken…

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Slap the salmon

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And the phase change from uncooked to cooked.

      • marius@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Where do I find cooked in the phase diagram?

    • zedgeist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      🤔

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Also at room temperature, the average speed of atoms in the material is at 400 m/s, at least for a gas. That might give you a hint.

  • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A guy on YT actually tried it experimentally a few years ago (how many slaps, not how fast one slap); and it works to some degree! The main problem becomes to make a slapping machine that can survive long enough:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFhnnTWMgI&pp=ygURc2xhcCBjb29rIGNoaWNrZW7SBwkJzgkBhyohjO8%3D

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He also did a turkey a couple years after that for “slapsgiving”

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikiwW9VA9hk

    • zedgeist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      YouTube is truly a wonder of stupidity. Sometimes in good ways

      • kiagam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        This slap question was a big meme several years ago, and when that video came out (years after the meme), it was an instant hit.

        The fact that this discussion is still going shows how popular it is

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        IDK, might be laying the groundwork for future kinetic cookers.

  • Sophocles@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Bro really wanted his chicken well done at 400°F

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Naw, that’s burnt.

      Maillard reaction where things brown starts at 350f.

      More than 165/175 in the center and that’s dried out.

      • froh42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I saw your username first.

        Then I misread the rest as a Mallard Reaction.

        • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          that only happens in ducks

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The mallard reaction is only relevant when cooking duck.

      • Graphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If you spatchcock your bird then you’ve only gotta slap your cock to about 150°F at the thickest part of breast

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          naturally. Best to slow it down and keep it juicy, too. I like smoking them at about 200 f, it’s perfection.

          also… way to make spatchcocking sound even dirtier than it is. the no cooks here are probably thinking it’s some sort of sex act and the rest of us are wondering if it’s not also some sort of sex act.

          • Estradiol Enjoyer @lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            spatchcocked birds also kinda look like a random roadkill animal to the ignorant, idk if you care about who sees you grillin

  • LEM 1689@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Cook your hand too 😄

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.12K users / day
  • 5.13K users / week
  • 5.15K users / month
  • 5.16K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 15.4K subscribers
  • 189 Posts
  • 1.46K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org